Custom Robot Servo
AMR Drive Partnership

AMR Servo Drive ODM Partner Evaluator

Screen whether a standard drive, integration support, custom PCBA, or joint design is the right starting route. Then review the technical and commercial details a supplier needs to confirm.

Request an ODM scope reviewCompare sourcing paths

AMR Servo Drive Sourcing Screen

Select your application, payload, customization scope, and planned volume to see a starting partner path. The prefilled choices are examples; change them to match your project.

AMR project requirements

The route is selected only from customization scope. Application, payload, and planned annual volume add RFQ context; they do not establish a drive voltage, motor rating, NRE, MOQ, or schedule. The volume bands are intake labels, not economic breakpoints.

Initial sourcing path

Suggested partner route

COTS with integration support

Planned volume: 100–1,000 units

Why this path?

Ask the supplier to scope firmware, connector, or cable changes against the selected drive platform. Agree the interface definition, ownership of changes, and any re-testing required for the modified configuration.

Engineering boundary

This screen does not size the drive or estimate NRE, MOQ, or lead time. Confirm the battery's minimum and maximum voltage, motor speed and torque, peak current, braking behavior, interfaces, and validation plan with engineering and the supplier.

Discuss this sourcing path

Share the agv / tow tractor application, 100–500 kg payload class, battery operating-voltage range, motor speed and torque requirements, communication interface, and target quantity for a project-specific review.

Choose a route from the constraint you need to solve

An ODM project is useful when a specific requirement cannot be met by a suitable catalog drive or a limited integration change. The choice depends on verified motor, battery, enclosure, and interface requirements—not payload class or annual volume alone.

Start with COTS

Use a catalog drive when its published electrical, mechanical, communication, environmental, and safety characteristics meet the application.

Scope integration work

Consider firmware, connector, cable, or configuration changes when the base drive fits but integration details do not.

Evaluate ODM / JDM

Request custom development when board layout, form factor, interfaces, or design ownership need project-specific work.

Compare the integration shape

These diagrams show example topologies only. Axis count, communication links, isolation, and power distribution depend on the selected motors and system safety design.

Separate catalog drives
Example with separate catalog drivesOne host controller connects separately to a left and a right drive.Host controllerDrive ADrive B

Separate units can simplify replacement, but require product-specific wiring and configuration.

Integrated custom drive candidate
Example integrated custom driveA host controller connects to one custom board that controls two axes.Host controllerCustom drive boardAxis A + B

Integration can be tailored to the chassis; validate thermal, electrical, service, and safety trade-offs.

Compare sourcing models

AMR servo drive sourcing route comparison
RouteConsider whenMain trade-offConfirm with supplier
COTSA catalog unit meets the project envelope.Less freedom to change hardware or interfaces.Exact configuration, stock, warranty, and product life.
Integration supportThe base drive fits with limited firmware, connector, cable, or parameter changes.Modified configurations may need regression testing and support agreements.Change scope, ownership, validation, price, and schedule.
Custom ODMBoard layout, power stage, or form factor needs custom engineering.More control brings design, validation, and lifecycle responsibilities.NRE, MOQ, unit pricing, test plan, deliverables, and lead time.
Joint design (JDM)Both parties need to shape the requirements or product architecture.Requires clear decision rights and contractual IP boundaries.Background and project IP, exclusivity, support, and change control.

NRE, MOQ, pricing, and schedule are project-specific. Public evidence is not sufficient to give a dependable universal range for these items; ask suppliers to quote against the same written requirements and validation scope.

Need a comparable supplier proposal?

Request a scope review using the same engineering and validation assumptions.

Request a scope review

Define the engineering evidence before design freeze

Electrical envelope

Record battery minimum under load, maximum at full charge, peak and continuous current, motor speed and torque, and regenerative braking behavior. Check them against the exact drive limits.

Thermal conditions

Share duty cycle, ambient temperature, enclosure, mounting surface, and available airflow. Ask how losses and temperature rise will be verified in the intended assembly.

Mechanical environment

Describe the vehicle route, mounting points, expected shocks, and vibration exposure. Agree the fixture, axes, test profile, duration, operating state, and pass criteria.

Interfaces and ownership

Document motor feedback, fieldbus, safety functions, service access, drawings, firmware responsibilities, and the evidence each party must deliver.

Vibration evidence and limits

IEC 60068-2-6 describes a sinusoidal-vibration test method for assessing specimens against specified severities. It does not provide one universal AMR pass level. Select the profile from the vehicle environment and product requirements, then review the actual test report and mounting setup.

IEC 60068-2-6:2007 official catalog description

Source and page scope reviewed 29 September 2026. The catalog entry describes the method and specified test severities; the project must still define its own acceptance criteria.

Common risks and practical checks

Voltage-window mismatch

A nominal battery label is not the full operating range. Compare the battery and drive limits at charge, under load, and during regeneration before choosing a bus voltage.

Thermal assumptions do not match the vehicle

Compact packaging can constrain heat removal. Validate the assembled drive at the application duty cycle and ambient range; do not assume that a different MOSFET or cooling method alone resolves it.

Unpriced validation scope

A proposal can omit fixtures, lab tests, redesign loops, or production acceptance. Request a deliverable-by- deliverable quotation and define who owns each test and corrective action.

AMR servo drive ODM questions

Can this evaluator recommend a voltage or motor rating?

No. Payload and application class are not sufficient for electrical sizing. Provide the motor speed and torque envelope, battery minimum and maximum voltage, peak current, and braking behavior for an engineering review.

What MOQ, NRE, and lead time should I expect?

These depend on design changes, validation, sourcing, and production scope. Ask each supplier for separate engineering, tooling, test, sample, and recurring production costs with the assumptions stated.

Does IEC 60068-2-6 certify an AMR drive?

It is a sinusoidal-vibration test method, not a universal AMR product certificate. Request the report, test severity, fixture and mounting details, operating state, and acceptance criteria for the actual assembly.

How should we handle firmware and design IP?

Define background IP, project-specific deliverables, source or object-code access, modification rights, exclusivity, maintenance, and end-of-life support in the contract before development begins.

Related AMR drive resources